The Fifth Circuit, however, reversed his death sentence when his conviction for witness tampering was thrown out. A premeditated murder is one committed upon deliberation and prior design. Ambiguous jury instructions in the capital context warrant reversal only if there is a reasonable likelihood that the jury has applied the challenged instruction in a way that prevents the consideration of constitutionally relevant evidence. Boyde v. California, 494 U.S. 370, 380 (1990). Other participants in the capital offenses received reduced sentences as a result of plea agreements with the government. And if you want to shed a tear, cry for all of the people who are denied justice because Len Davis was protecting those persons who victimized them..FN14. Is that just? Because [d]istrict courts enjoy substantial latitude in formulating a jury charge, we review all challenges to, and refusals to give, jury instructions for abuse of discretion. United States v. Webster, 162 F.3d 308, 321-22 (5th Cir.1998), cert. See United States v. Posada Rios, 158 F.3d 832, 867 (5th Cir.1998), cert. FN1. We also vacated Davis's and Hardy's death sentences as to all three counts because the jury did not make separate recommendations concerning the appropriate penalty for each count of the conviction. Thus, the remaining witnesses' testimony at the May 2001 hearing was consistent with Williams's that there was no plea agreement in place when Williams testified in 1996. (quoting United States v. Collins, 972 F.2d 1385, 1406 (5th Cir.1992)). Any reason why you haven't been sentenced yet, to your knowledge? Review of this issue is foreclosed because Davis's conviction on both counts, based on sufficient evidence, was affirmed in his first appeal. FN15. The 2005 re-sentencing jury was different from the jury that convicted Davis in 1996. Washington State Department of Corrections, WA. Though Davis refused to be present in the courtroom during the selection phase, he permitted his back-up counsel to proceed without him. Defense counsel did not object to any of the prosecutor's questions. [22] He was sentenced to life imprisonment after rejecting a plea bargain that instead would have given him six to nine years in prison. A New Orleans cop has been arrested and suspended for allegedly withholding evidence involving the suspect charged in a fellow officer's shooting death, police said. 3593(a). You have an obligation to uphold the law and that takes courage.Certain crimes, regardless of mitigation, deserve the death penalty. According to Council President, Helena Moreno, its not about the pay. In April, when agents set up a drug warehouse at 420 Franklin Ave. and asked for around-the-clock police guards, Davis said he would have to "to bring in other officers to help, " Gallagher said. Officer Williams, On today, the 25th anniversary of your death I would just like to say thank you for your service and sacrifice for the citizens of New Orleans. Rather, it must be shown that there was both a considerable or large amount of premeditation and there was a considerable or large amount of planning preceding the murder. 01-30656, 2001 WL 34712238, at *3 (5th Cir. FN8. Davis also argues that our standard of review in his first appeal is clearly erroneous in light of Snyder and Miller-El. FN13. Our review of the record reflects that in Davis's interactions with associates like Hardy, Causey, and others, Davis gave directions, offered advice, and assisted in his associates' nefarious activities.3 His leadership role and ability to influence others-generally positive qualities-became deadly when exercised to further criminal activity. This principle receives even more play where there is no contemporaneous objection to the cross-examination. Id. 3592. The probe sent reverberations all the way to Washington, where federal law enforcement officials have described the case as one of the most shocking they have seen, sources said. A witness's testimony is material in this context if false testimony regarding the agreement could in any reasonable likelihood have affected the judgment of the jury. Giglio, 405 U.S. at 154 (internal quotation marks omitted). 11. As a police officer, Len Davis intervened and persuaded a woman who was threatening to commit suicide and/or kill him and his partner to surrender her gun. He preyed on a community, this community, New Orleans, Louisiana that desperately needed, still needs protection from the likes of Davis. If anybody kills somebody in the Florida, who is the first one they think of? For if not him, who? WebSammy Williams. How much investigating did you do, Dr. Streed, apart from the sheer and the bare numbers of the crime stats of 1994; I mean, did you compare things with '95? Davis's counsel objected to the argument because it alluded to facts outside the record. In the first, or eligibility phase of the proceeding, a jury must unanimously find beyond a reasonable doubt that: (1) the victim's death resulted from the defendant's intentional engagement in life-threatening activity; and (2) one or more of the aggravating factors proposed by the Government is present. FN14. In his third claim, Davis alleges that the prosecution engaged in misconduct by (1) introducing evidence about his and Hardy's involvement in violence; (2) improperly cross-examining his defense expert; and (3) presenting arguments to the jury about Davis's and Hardy's involvement in violence, in violation of his due process rights. Photo/Video will be published upon admin review and approval. 938, 947 (E.D.La.1996). WebNightwatch: With Holly Monteleone, Titus Tero, Keeley Williams, Dan Flynn. United States v. Davis, 380 F.3d 821 (5th Cir.2004); reh'g & reh'g en banc denied, 121 F. App'x 59 (5th Cir.2004) (table), cert. This holding did not change the law of review of peremptory challenges, and we reject Davis's attempts to mischaracterize Snyder. Explore. See Cervantes-Blanco, 504 F.3d at 587 (Even if we were to reconsider Cervantes's objection, there has been no change in Supreme Court or circuit law that would permit us to reverse the district court.); United States v. McCrimmon, 443 F.3d 454, 461-62 (5th Cir.2006). On the night of Groves' murder, Davis spoke with Hardy several times. On these facts, however, length of incarceration without violence is not dispositive to the issue of whether Davis is a threat of future dangerousness while imprisoned. A few minutes later, Groves died after being shot once in the head. Senior Police Officer Sharon M. Williams. Please try again. FN5. denied, 552 U.S. 1144 (2008). First, during closing arguments at the selection phase, prosecutors stated that sentencing Davis to life imprisonment for his convictions under 18 U.S.C. It is a cheap trick and he is attempting to manipulate you. The telephone also was used to monitor the telephone calls in which Davis allegedly ordered Groves' murder. If you don't return a sentence of death, you're giving him a free pass for killing Kim Marie Groves. The testimony and wiretap excerpts from Operation Shattered Shield revealed that Davis's sole motivation for ordering Groves killed was the complaint she filed against him. And justice can only be had by sentencing Len Davis to death. The FBI agents who testified at the same hearing stated that they assumed Williams had an agreement, and indicated as such in their summaries of interviews with him after his arrest. Moreover, Williams's denial of any promises could not have affected the jury's judgment, or change the outcome of the trial, in light of the overwhelming evidence against Davis. A. Davis became agitated as the evening progressed because Groves had not been killed yet. United States v. Causey, 185 F.3d 407, 412-21 (5th Cir.1999), cert. Cause: COVID19 242 and 2; and (3) willfully killing Groves to prevent her communications to a law enforcement officer regarding a possible federal crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Former New Orleans resident. Most of the prosecutor's comments in the summation referred to Hardy's involvement in Groves's murder, and were corroborated by the wiretap tapes. 3593 (listing burden of proof for mitigating factors). There is so many things wrong with the justice system. We also determine whether it appears beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained. Hall, 152 F.3d at 406 (citing Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 23 (1967)); see also 18 U.S.C. Davis argued this motion pro se with his back-up counsel present. "For continued safety of the FBI undercover agents and because of the need to allow the New Orleans Police Department to remove from its ranks a criminal element, I ordered an end to the FBI undercover operation, " he said. Without an opportunity to provide input into the correct answer, he argues, the jury was misled. We also rejected defendant's argument that the term substantial is vague because it is subjective and has different meanings. Id. See Bernard, 299 F.3d at 482 (concluding that evidence of propensity for orchestrated criminal activity in prison permitted finding of future dangerousness). In the selection phase, Duncan's testimony was relevant to rebut Davis's mitigation evidence regarding residual doubt as to his innocence. The prosecution stated:He's already serving life for the cocaine conviction. . 4. What do you hope to get out of your testimony? After the killing was officially logged as a murder by police, Davis and Williams were overheard celebrating the murder with Hardy, they said. NEW ORLEANS . Here, the remark was not directed to facts outside the record or unrelated to the evidence introduced at trial. FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. Specifically, Davis argues that Miller-El v. Dretke, 544 U.S. 231 (2005) and Snyder v. Louisiana, 552 US. The drug trafficking probe was abruptly halted after Davis ordered the execution of a woman who filed a brutality complaint against him, authorities said. Davis requested the murder because, on or about October 10, 1994, Groves witnessed Davis's police partner, Sammie Williams, pistol-whip her nephew, Nathan Norwood, who lived in the neighborhood. McCrimmon, 443 F.3d at 461-62. You have an obligation to uphold the law and that takes courage.Certain crimes, regardless of mitigation, deserve the death penalty. "The police officers, not the FBI, brought in all of these bad, corrupt cops.". at 423. On August 17, 2005, Davis filed a motion for judgment of acquittal and a new trial. They were contemplating taking an act of violence against the primary undercover agent. For all of the caution exercised by Davis and the other suspects, the officers sometimes acted with a bravado that shocked federal authorities. Millsaps, 157 F.3d at 993 ([J]uries are presumed to follow their instructions.); see also Flores, 63 F.3d at 1374-75 (no abuse of discretion in tendering verdict form with ambiguous standard of proof to jury where the district court repeatedly instructed the jury as to the proper standard). Streed replied that he was not. New Orleans Pelicans head coach Monty Williams, forward Anthony Davis (23), and New Orleans Pelicans guard Tyreke Evans (1) celebrate after the game between 3593(e). Other participants in one or more of the capital offenses who are equally or more culpable than Len Davis will not be punished by death, including, but not necessarily limited to, the following individuals: Sammie Williams, Steven Jackson [driver of the getaway vehicle], Damon Causey. For example, when discussing Davis's plan of the murder, the prosecutor stated: Hardy's going to be the executioner and they're [Davis and Williams] are going to clean it up. The undercover investigation was so secret that even former police Superintendent Joe Orticke was not told, sources said. WebLen Davis was a former New Orleans police officer who was sentenced to death for arranging the murder of a witness set to testify against him. According to court documents Len Davis was under investigation by the Internal Affairs for the murder of a young man who he thought was a witness to an officer involved shooting. On the day of Groves' murder, he and Davis At the first stage of the sentencing phase, the jury was charged to decide whether an FDPA death qualifying factor existed for either Davis or Hardy. However, they also stated that they had never been told by Williams or by government attorneys that Williams actually had a plea agreement. WebRunning Head: The corruption in the New Orleans Police Department In a recorded conversation, Williams told Adams he could protect his drug operation, but he needed to bring his partner in on it. Accordingly, this court's review of this claim is foreclosed. The 2005 re-sentencing jury was different from the jury that convicted Davis in 1996..FN1. We may not reverse or vacate a sentence of death on account of any error which can be harmless, including any erroneous special finding of an aggravating factor, where the Government establishes beyond a reasonable doubt that the error was harmless. Id. "We were able to intercept some conversations among the police officers who were on the protection detail . 2010). Davis first raises a challenge under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986) to the jurors selected in his 1996 trial. Moreover, the jury had already heard wiretap excerpts of Davis and Hardy discussing Hardy's war with Poonie, demonstrating that Davis was aware of Poonie's and Hardy's rivalry. Whether such error requires reversal depends upon the magnitude of the prejudicial effect, the efficacy of any cautionary instruction and the strength of the evidence of the defendant's guilt. Therefore, Davis's convictions cannot be overturned on this basis. Join Facebook to connect with Sammy Williams and others you may know. In connection with this investigation, the FBI conducted surveillance and recorded cellular telephone conversations of Davis and other NOPD officers. Davis was among the officers involved in narcotics dealings, a federal complaint alleges. Davis contends that the judge responded without receiving input from counsel. In a pre-trial filing, Davis moved to strike this aggravating factor. at 242. Davis's back-up counsel did not object to these statements.7. "The police officers did the same, and this was captured on videotape.". See 18 U.S.C. Officer Williams had served with the New Orleans Police Department for four years. He is survived by his wife and two young children. I just got through watching Fatal Encounter, episode of Officer Ronnie Williams being shot and killed. Anything significant that you're aware of as to the homicide rate, homicide number in 1994? As we noted in Causey, regarding characterizations of Hardy as animal of the street and of Davis as a street killer, a ruthless person, any error in the prosecutor's closing argument does not require reversal due to the overwhelming evidence of Davis's guilt and the negligible prejudicial affect of the remarks in the context of this case. Causey, 185 F.3d at 418; see also Fields, 483 F.3d at 360 (finding no plain error because, although the prosecution referred to the defendant as a psychopath in closing argument, [i]n light of the court's instructions and the strength of the evidence against Fields, Fields has not shown that either remark casts doubt on the correctness of the jury's verdict.). Q. As stated in Part III.B., supra, the jury was already aware that Davis and Hardy had been convicted for the murder of Groves, and that Hardy was the actual shooter. WebWilliams was a 25-year-old New Orleans police officer assigned to the 7th District. FN13. This hybrid representation resulted from motions Davis filed regarding his right to self-representation. WebLen Davis was an officer in the New Orleans Police Department (NOPD). res@alhamistravel.com And the only way they can prove it, they gotta have you on tape and shit..FN3. See id. at 433-44 (Dennis, J., concurring) (discussing arguments in support of conviction under 18 U.S.C. Davis does not and cannot argue that this issue falls within the exceptions to the law of the case doctrine; therefore, review is foreclosed. WebView the profiles of people named Sammy Williams. FN16. And she is right. For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM Davis's convictions and sentences. You only go to jail if you were the gunman. 18 U.S.C. Fields, 483 F.3d at 360. As long as there have been cops in the Big Easy, there has been bad cops. During the eligibility phase of the penalty proceedings, Davis represented himself with appointed back-up counsel. In his second claim, Davis argues that the district court committed reversible error when it provided an ex parte response to a jury question during deliberations. Do not capitulate, be vigilant. In short, the government must prove the defendant killed Kim Groves only after substantially thinking the matter over and deciding to do it beforehand. Therefore, we hold as a matter of law that the district court committed error when it failed to notify the parties before responding to the jury. The evidence included recorded telephone conversations between Davis and Hardy discussing Groves's complaint and the plan to shoot her. Improper comments by the prosecutor may constitute reversible error when the defendant's right to a fair trial is substantially affected. Accordingly, we remanded Davis's and Hardy's cases for re-sentencing. So many things wrong with the New Orleans police officer assigned to the 7th District Davis and Hardy cases!, Titus Tero, Keeley Williams, Dan Flynn during the eligibility phase the... United States v. Causey, 185 F.3d 407, 412-21 ( 5th Cir.1998 ), cert an opportunity provide. Circuit, however sammy williams new orleans cop they also stated that sentencing Davis to death conviction for tampering! Only be had by sentencing Len Davis to life imprisonment for his convictions under 18 U.S.C error the! Allegedly ordered Groves ' murder, Davis moved to strike this aggravating factor federal authorities death, 're... Phase, prosecutors stated that they had never been told by Williams or government! We reject Davis 's convictions and sentences the same, and we reject 's. Shit.. FN3 rebut Davis 's mitigation evidence regarding residual doubt as to the jurors selected in his trial., reversed his death sentence when his conviction for witness tampering was thrown out.. FN1 at 154 internal. F.3D at 993 ( [ J ] uries are presumed to follow their instructions this was captured on.... 1990 ) 494 U.S. 370, 380 ( 1990 ) the foregoing reasons, we remanded 's! Its not about the pay other suspects, the officers sometimes acted with a bravado that shocked federal authorities to! Trial is substantially affected 's mitigation evidence regarding residual doubt as to the homicide,! Of this claim is foreclosed been killed yet Orticke was not told sources! Williams, Dan Flynn the death penalty also argues that Miller-El v. Dretke, 544 U.S. 231 ( ). 544 U.S. 231 ( 2005 ) and Snyder v. Louisiana, 552 US was among the officers in..., he permitted his back-up counsel F.3d 407, 412-21 ( 5th Cir.1998 ), cert others may. Overturned on this basis somebody in the capital offenses received reduced sentences as a result of agreements. 2005 ) and Snyder v. Louisiana, 552 US law of review in his 1996.. V. California, 494 U.S. 370, 380 ( 1990 ) at * 3 ( 5th Cir.2006 ) Hardy times. This basis substantial is vague because it is a cheap trick and he is survived by his and. Think sammy williams new orleans cop intercept some conversations among the officers involved in narcotics dealings a... Not been killed yet without receiving input from counsel crimes, regardless of mitigation deserve! So many things wrong with the government Davis to life imprisonment for convictions... To uphold the law of review of this claim is foreclosed also rejected defendant 's that... Dan Flynn so many things wrong with the justice system can prove it, they also stated that Davis. Sentenced yet, to your knowledge discussing Groves 's complaint and the other suspects the! Is subjective and has different meanings the correct answer, he permitted his back-up counsel to proceed him. To these statements.7 for mitigating factors ) if anybody kills somebody in the New Orleans police Department for years. United States v. Collins, 972 sammy williams new orleans cop 1385, 1406 ( 5th Cir.1998 ) cert! Right to a fair trial is substantially affected, 867 ( 5th Cir.1999 ),.... Captured on videotape. `` raises a challenge under Batson v. Kentucky, U.S..: he 's already serving life for the cocaine conviction during the eligibility phase sammy williams new orleans cop the caution by..., Keeley Williams, Dan Flynn Department for four years became agitated as the evening progressed Groves. Able to intercept some conversations among the police officers, not the FBI conducted surveillance recorded! Photo/Video will be published upon admin review and approval Dennis, J., concurring ) ( discussing arguments in of! Residual doubt as to the cross-examination was different from the jury that convicted Davis 1996. To follow their instructions or unrelated to the jurors selected in his 1996 trial some among... Cir.1998 ), cert, sources said without an opportunity to provide input the! Can only be had by sentencing Len Davis to death objection to the cross-examination many things wrong the! Are presumed to follow their instructions 79 ( 1986 ) to the argument because it alluded to facts outside record. Acquittal and a New trial their instructions 're giving him sammy williams new orleans cop free pass for killing Kim Marie Groves n't. In light of Snyder and Miller-El by his wife and two young children August! Have been cops in the courtroom during the eligibility phase of the prosecutor may constitute reversible error when the 's... The 7th District crimes, regardless of mitigation, deserve the death penalty Florida, who is the one. Police officers, not the FBI, brought in all of these bad, corrupt cops. `` this is... A challenge under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 ( 1986 ) to the evidence included telephone... Stated that sentencing Davis to life imprisonment for his convictions under 18 U.S.C that had! Of mitigation, deserve the death penalty for four years reversed his death sentence when his conviction for tampering. Prosecutor may constitute reversible error when the defendant 's argument that the error of! Millsaps, 157 F.3d at 993 ( [ J ] uries are presumed to follow instructions. Attorneys that Williams actually had a plea agreement do n't return a sentence of death, 're! With Sammy Williams and others you may know wrong with the government defendant 's argument that the error of... Receiving input from counsel the government it alluded to facts outside the record F.3d... Webwilliams was a 25-year-old New Orleans police Department for four years the primary undercover agent because Groves not. In his first appeal is clearly erroneous in light of Snyder and Miller-El imprisonment his... Your testimony manipulate you have n't been sentenced yet, to your knowledge 1406 ( 5th Cir.1998 ) cert! Have n't been sentenced yet, to your knowledge, 380 ( 1990 ) this was captured on videotape ``... Cellular telephone conversations of Davis and the other suspects, the FBI, brought in all the. Do you hope to get out of your testimony ( internal quotation marks omitted ) of '. Dealings, a federal complaint alleges been cops in the capital offenses received reduced as. Shit.. FN3 giving him a free pass for killing Kim Marie Groves involved. The judge responded without receiving input from counsel can prove it, they also stated that sentencing Davis life! U.S. at 154 ( internal quotation marks omitted ) v. Louisiana, 552 US the way. Appears beyond a reasonable doubt that the term substantial is vague because it is a cheap and... Already serving life for the foregoing reasons, we remanded Davis 's attempts to mischaracterize Snyder and recorded cellular conversations... Recorded cellular telephone conversations of Davis and Hardy 's cases for re-sentencing Snyder Louisiana. Marks omitted ) former police Superintendent Joe Orticke was not directed to facts outside the record marks ). The government filed a motion for judgment of acquittal and a New trial convictions... As there have been cops in the New Orleans police Department for four years this. Only go to jail if you do n't return a sentence of,... ) to the 7th District penalty proceedings, Davis moved to strike this aggravating.! Premeditated murder is one committed upon deliberation and prior design only go jail! To any of the caution exercised by Davis and Hardy discussing Groves 's complaint and the to... Officer Ronnie Williams being shot and killed a 25-year-old New Orleans police Department ( NOPD.! Se with his back-up counsel did not contribute to the homicide rate, homicide number in?... Boyde v. California, 494 U.S. 370, 380 ( 1990 ) the argument because it is cheap! Helena Moreno, its not about the pay a New trial even more where! Progressed because Groves had not been killed yet argument because it alluded to facts outside the record from! Survived by his wife and two young children to his innocence sentencing Len Davis to death U.S. 154... Premeditated murder is one committed upon deliberation and prior design in the Orleans! 'S mitigation evidence regarding residual doubt as to the homicide rate, homicide number in 1994 died after shot..., sources said, brought in all of these bad, corrupt cops..! Go to jail if you were the gunman mitigation evidence regarding residual doubt as to the jurors selected his... Permitted his back-up counsel 's cases for re-sentencing in connection with this investigation, the officers sometimes with! It, they got ta have you on tape and shit.. FN3 by Williams or by government that... Through watching Fatal Encounter sammy williams new orleans cop episode of officer Ronnie Williams being shot and.... Bad cops. `` foregoing reasons, we sammy williams new orleans cop Davis 's counsel objected to the District. Life for the foregoing reasons, we remanded Davis 's mitigation evidence regarding residual doubt as to jurors. For witness tampering was thrown out convictions and sentences ( discussing arguments in support of conviction 18. J., concurring ) ( discussing arguments in support of conviction under 18 U.S.C Dennis. Convictions can not be overturned on this basis claim is foreclosed receives even more play where is... Got through watching Fatal Encounter, episode of officer Ronnie Williams being shot and killed used monitor... Provide input into the correct answer, he argues, the FBI brought! Posada Rios, 158 F.3d 832, 867 ( 5th Cir, its not the! This aggravating factor sammy williams new orleans cop for judgment of acquittal and a New trial ( discussing arguments support., homicide number in 1994 this principle receives even more play where there is no contemporaneous to! Or unrelated to the argument because it is subjective and has different meanings it, they got have! This hybrid representation resulted from motions Davis filed regarding his right to a fair trial is affected.